mUltimate Chopin

Op. 28 No. 20, Prelude in C minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Errors in GE

Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 9

composition: Op. 28 No. 20, Prelude in C minor

 in A (→FC,FE→EE), ACh, CGS & GE2 (→GE3)

 in GE1
..

The fact that the  indication was repeated in GE1 resulted from distraction of the engraver; he did not notice (did not understand?) the  indication written in the abridged marking of that bar in FC. The mistake was rectified in GE2 (→GE3). See also the note to b. 11-12.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 11-12

composition: Op. 28 No. 20, Prelude in C minor

cresc. - - in A (→FE→EE)

cresc. in bar 12 in FC

No indication in GE

cresc. in ACh

cresc. -, cresc. in CGS
..

In the main text we give the indication after A (→FE→EE). In A its correct placement is not possible due to the abridged notation of those bars; however, we consider the interpretation adopted in FE (→EE) to be accurate – due to the dashes marking the range of the crescendo, all that matters is to determine its starting point, which falls more or less in the middle of the bar. Placing cresc. (with no dashes) only in bar 12 is undoubtedly a mistake by Fontana, aggravated in GE by the omission of the indication.
In the 9-bar version of AB the dynamic course could have been different, hence the missing cresc. does not have to be considered an inaccuracy. An earlier beginning of the crescendo, as it was marked by Chopin in ACh, may be considered an equal variant.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , Errors of FC , Inaccuracies in CGS